For it is the duty of the good man to teach others the good that you could not work because of the malignity of the times or of fortune, so that when many are capable of it, someone of them more loved by heaven will be able to work it.
Monday, 5 July 2010
Saturday, 26 June 2010
Dictionary of Received Ideas
Academics, never live in the 'real world', don't understand business
Activist, never an academic, involved in the real world
Art, neither autonomous nor propoganda. Always problematising, questioning, making one think. Provocative, but never be so vulgar as to be actually shocked.
Blogs, destroying our culture or giving birth to a new public sphere. When meeting a blog writer always express suprise they find time to write it, never visit.
Deconstruction, passe, but express admiration for Derrida
Difference, see Same
Fundamentalism, condemn in all forms
Lenin, misunderstood, admire tentatively
Marxism, always teleological, stagist, and reductivist. Express appreciation for the thought of Marx, but with the proviso it won't quite do today.
The Novel, 'Dead', or 'In better health than ever (thanks to Coetzee)'
Novels, always be writing one.
Rhizome, better than trees, see Tree
Same, see Difference
Sex, now liberated
Temporary Autonomous Space, live in one
Tree, worse than rhizomes, see Rhizome
Zizek, too popular, really a Stalinist, but always provocative
Tuesday, 22 June 2010
Saturday, 12 June 2010
Our Bloch
'Like all thought worthy of the name, Evan's thrives on the edge of failure, in close proximity to sympathy for the occult.'
Thursday, 10 June 2010
We come from the land of ice and snow
His contribution, 'The Winter Wind', celebrates the "bitter wind," under whose frosty breath all the weak must die, and in which the fit will recognize each other by their red cheeks (not from shame) in order to unite in a caste of heroes ....
It's interesting to analyse, as this post does, the radicalised nihilism of such fascist/Nazi 'theories', or pseudo-theories, not least for the questions they raise about the attractions of nihilism more generally and question of active/passive/completed nihilism. In what forms do such nihilisms seem to allow/accept ther very hierarchisations and distinctions they (should) problematise? What questions does this raise for the contemporary valorisation of nihilism? Is a cosmogenic 'absolute nihilism', thinking here of Thomas Ligotti, an exit from such attractions or does it reproduce an elitism of the confrontation with meaninglessness?

